POLYVINYL ALCOHOL (PVA, PVOH) | How Easily Does it Biodegrade?

When we develop products, we stick to these 3 principles:

  1. It has to biodegrade (that means it will decompose into reusable nutrients)
  2. It has to have an eco certification (meaning the ingredients that make our products are 3rd party accredited, so they are best in class for you and our planet)
  3. It’s gotta be plastic free (both to reduce the carbon footprint and, again, to biodegrade)

When we started developing our plastic free liquid dish soap, we wrestled with what plastic alternatives we could use to store it.

The first option we explored was PVOH, PVA, or PVAL - otherwise known as Polyvinyl alcohol.  

PVA/PVOH gained popularity with Dishwasher pods and has since been used to contain a variety of Dishwasher, Laundry detergents and Shampoos for a number of ‘eco brands’, including both 'pods' and also 'laundry sheets', which are becoming increasingly popular.  

PVA/PVOH is technically 'plastic' because it is pliable - bendy and stretchy - but it's not the same plastic as a plastic bag because of what happens to it when it contacts water.

Many companies claim PVA/PVOH is ‘biodegradable’, but when we started digging deeper, this ‘eco-claim’ wasn't so cut and dry.

Why?

PVOH DOESN’T ‘BIODEGRADE’ IT ‘DISSOLVES’

In our research, PVOH does not biodegrade so much as it dissolves into a "non-harmful" monomer, and while those molecules can biodegrade, the time it takes for them to actually biodegrade is a little foggy.  Years, decades, 100 years or more?  Our research wasn't able to provide any conclusive timelines. 

Advocates for PVOH say this is not a problem and it’s a lot better than having mounds of 'solid' plastic floating around the ocean, but it still is leaving ‘something’ behind.  

In a recent Journal article from the Royal Society titled: Microplastics and synthetic particles ingested by deep-sea amphipods in six of the deepest marine ecosystems on Earth, Scientists from Newcastle University conducted what they consider to be a more comprehensive study of microplastics in our Oceans by exploring the ingestion of micro plastics in deep sea trenches.  

By focusing on the deepest reaches of our Oceans, we are better able to glean just how far microplastic pollution has travelled.

“A subsample of microfibres and fragments analysed using FTIR were found to be a collection of plastic and synthetic materials (Nylon, polyethylene, polyamide, polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinylchloride, often with inorganic filler material), semi-synthetic (rayon and lyocell) and natural fibre (ramie). Notwithstanding, this study reports the deepest record of microplastic ingestion, indicating that anthropogenic debris is bioavailable to organisms at some of the deepest locations in the Earth's oceans.” (A. J. Jamieson, L. S. R. Brooks, W. D. K. Reid, S. B. Piertney, B. E. Narayanaswamy and T. D. Linley, The Royal Society Publishing, February 27th, 2019).

PVOH IS OIL BASED = NOT CARBON NEUTRAL

The other challenge with PVOH is that it is derived from petrochemicals (oil based and therefore against dev principal 2).  That said, right now, it's really hard to avoid petrochemicals - hence why we are in the climate crisis we are currently in - because even most 'plant based' cleaners (including our own) contain small amounts of petrochemicals.   

WHY BEESWAX PODS?

Given the unknowns about biodegradation, long term impacts and the reliance on petrochemicals, we chose not to use PVA/PVOH and instead developed our own pod made from all natural materials.  Materials we were already familiar with from our other products - beeswax and other naturally occurring oils, waxes and resins.


What’s great about natural materials is that you don’t need a pile of research to figure out if they decompose - you can just toss them in the earth and know they'll go away.

BUT THERE'S A FLIP SIDE TO OUR BEESWAX PODS
  1. They cost moreR&D is time consuming and expensive.  We are still in the early stages of developing our pods and there are many improvements to be made - both from the design/materials and the manufacturing - and so that means we can't make them as cheaply as their PVA/PVOH counterparts.
  2. There is still 'waste': While the pods are natural and they can be repurposed, reused and composted, there is still 'waste' left behind.  PVOH on the other hand just dissolves.

When it comes to 'price', we did come up with a work around through the Plastic Free Club, but we feel that if we really want to make a change, we need to hit the MASSES and that requires a major drop in the price.  

And this has led us back to a core question.  Should we re-visit PVA/PVOH?

It’s definitely a step forward from traditional plastic, and we're already exploring an improvement that could see a similar film made without oil, but that is a couple years out (at best).  In the meantime, we are left deciding:

SHOULD WE CONTINUE TO DEVELOP OUR OWN ‘WAX SOAP-PODS’ OR SHOULD WE INCORPORATE POLYVINYL ALCOHOL (PVA, PVOH)?  JOIN THE CONVERSATION, COMMENT BELOW.

← Older Post Newer Post →


Comments


  • I vote not to incorporate PVOH, and keep up the good non-petrochemical work! We’ll all have to pay a price sooner or later, if we don’t get a handle on climate change caused in large part by the extraction, use, and disposal of oil-based products, and I vote for sooner. Get your customers and investors involved in drumming up support from those who can afford it, and donations to provide these products to those who can’t.

    Shari Lane on
  • I think you should continue to develop a non-petrochemical alternative to plastic. The more I learn, the more I believe that many of the problems we face stem from the petrochemical industry so reducing their grip on our economy is a lofty goal. To help with R&D, have you considered partnering with or creating a non-profit organization?

    Steve Mele on
  • I purchased your dish soap and am very happy with your pod option. I like the idea of staying away from oil based products. Thank you for your diligence!

    Debbi on
  • After reading the discussion above about your PVA/PVOH concerns, I am inclined to want you to stay with the beeswax, soy wax, etc., and continue your research into alternatives and improvements.
    I really appreciate you asking for input from your faithful customers and your goals of improving your products. It says a lot about your company!

    Linda Adams on
  • I would support incorporation of PVOH and at the same time pursue making this oil free in the future. I have purchased the wax soap pod product, however the price point is most likely discouraging for too many.

    Carl Olson on
  • I’m not comfortable with the unknowns surrounding the monomer. I support the wholly non-carbon-footprint approach and until there is more data available, I don’t want to see you compromise.

    Debbie DeKalb on
  • I would love to see you develop your own natural alternatives, the world desperately needs more innovators like you.

    Tracy Lynn Angel on
  • I vote do not incorporate PVOH please, continue to develop your own healthy products.

    DENISE B VELASCO on
  • Stick with the wax pods or look into algae pods, loliware is doing amazing things with algae.

    Bibi Prival on
  • PVA/PVOH is GRAS by EU, North American and other scientific authorities around the world. It is a significant improvement over traditional polymers. For the time being; I think that the proposed intended use of PVOH is a good interim alternative material to use while R&D continues on beeswax and/or other alternative materials.

    Tod Ransdell on


Leave a comment